It's deja vu all over again. The thought of Tony having to put on shades to view the RBT finally got to me so I restored the old template. Well, plus the fact that a recent Firefox update resulted in a small viewing problem when using that browser instead of IE. At least I think that's what did it. Egad, what a bother.
Comments:
- I added a divider (the small semi-tranparent horizontal line immediately under "Post a Comment") to, along with the indentation, help visually separate comments from any existing main page posts beneath them.
- Indented the heading "Comments:" (seen in bold when comments are expanded) so it falls in line with the rest of comment indenting. Neatness counts I guess.
All of this really only applies when multiple posts (with comments) are posted on the same day. Otherwise the date separators keep everything apart well enough. We can also force comments to come up in a separate page (ala the just replaced template). Have a preference?
- I like this setup. It makes more sense vis a vis the posts and comments. The color scheme is much more relaxing. Thanks
Post a Comment- Even short lived 'tradition' has amazing tenacity ... especially among old foggies like ... [unnamed to protect the innocent]. ;-)
Forget stupid light bulbs. Photonic Crystals might take the place of electronic semiconductor devices. They can work directly on light waves.
Comments:
Post a Comment- Butterfly wings act like photonic crystals to create the bright colors we see. They block certain frequencies of light (band gap) and permit others to reflect. Some closer and closer yet microscopic views of a butterfly wing scale. Also some Google image results for Butterfly Wings.
"Imagine a TV that is not just thin like a plasma screen, but thin like a birthday card. That lives in a narrow box near the ceiling and has a string you pull to unroll it."
Comments:
Post a Comment- Comparison and descriptions of Light Emitting Diodes (LEDs), Organic LEDs (OLEDs) and Phosphorescent OLED's (PLEDs). From Scientific American, February 2004: Better Displays with Organic Films.
Ever hear of Haunebu? Popular among the UFOlogists, it recently popped up in the April isue of one of my BMW motorycle magazines. Flying disks, magnetic propulsion, hypersonic flight, "ray" gun weaponry, visits to the moon. And all by the Nazis in the closing days of WWII.
Comments:
At last. A nut after our own hearts. The author of web site RatbagsDotCom takes the obsession with bentthink and documents it on sites by bentthinkers. A webomorphological pathology of why the 'net must be preserved as an entirely separate state of matter (or immatter).
Comments:
Post a Comment- Peter Bowditch is the author of RatbagsDotCom.
To perform an involuntary mental reboot, go here and read. Caution - don't read too much or too deeply. Do not operate kitchen appliances or use power tools while ingesting. Take a nice nap and wait for the friendly people to come for you.
Comments:
Post a Comment- This site is listed at RatbagsDotCom under the "Loon" section. Observe nature. Document wildlife where you find it.
Facts on the Cost of Health Care by the National Coalition on Health Care:
Comments:
Legal Debate: Assumptions on medical malpractice called into question
Comments:
Forget about right wing Bloggers this is scary!
Comments:
Post a Comment- It pays to have friends in high places. The same governor has a friend who has system that tracks CEUs needed to renew nursing licences. That certain state uses this system to determine license renewal so that nurses can continue to work at their profession and feed their families. Problem is that you have no certaintly of the data logged unless you pay a yearly fee that is almost as much as the renewal fee. You just can't be sure unless you have access to the record. No tickee, no job.
Same state has outsourced it's employment services to a company with a decidedly user unfriendly system that makes entering your weekly time sheet, applying for a jpb, and hiring an employee a hair raising screaming for valium experience. Oh and they outsourced personal data to an "off shore" company that may be selling information. Yes indeedy, we all need friends.
Couldn't pass up on passing this along--it involves a major Republican campaign donor, the Bush administration, our sick drug policy, our ever-decreasing privacy rights and yes, Jon Stewart fans, a penis pump.
Comments:
Post a Comment- I envision the scene from Bridge Over the River Kwai where Major Clipton (James Donald), overlooking chaos, can say only "Madness! MADNESS!!"
The Tejon Ranch Company got approval to expand the Tejon Ranch Industrial Complex in March, 2006. The ranch is home to the California Condor, has existed since an 1842 Mexican land grant, controls 280,000 acres of land between LA and Bakersfield, California, and is primarily a real estate development and agribusiness company. The court rejected arguments by the Center for Biological Diversity that development would affect native species and the recovery of the California Condor. The court and Kern County officials cited added jobs, increased tax revenue and the replacement of existing "dirty" diesel engines with "cleaner" diesel engines as positive indicators that the industrial site would be good for the area. See the MSN Money business/investing article dated March 27, 2006.
Comments:
And the waters get even murkier. Say hello to Astroturf sites.
Comments:
- Here's a real beauty called Handsoff.org. A groundswell of popular opinion? Nope. It's really these guys.
- That's very interesting. I wonder who their client is for this one? Or perhaps they are defending the medium that makes it possible for them to do businesss? Nah. It's all about money and assembling a "grass roots" supporter base from people who log onto the "handsoff" site out of curiosity or via accidental links from other sites. Go and look at one of the clients on their (Mercury Group's) web site - Tejon Ranch. They pitched it as condors vs giant energy. But the landowner is a huge land developer, after all. And the energy giant? Enron Wind, of course (as in "the answer is blowin' in the").
Post a Comment- Tejon ('badger") ranch, Mexican land grant 1842, 164 years of history, tradition of continuing stewardship ("carrying on the pioneering spirit of their forefathers"), conservation (up to 100,000 acres of sensitive habitat, condor preserve, environmentally sensitive development), Tejon Industrial Park, Development Plans ("The developments feature extensive areas of open space so the total acreage actually built upon during that 25-year period will represent only about five percent of the Ranch’s land."). So they hired the Mercury Group to mount an advertising campaign to defeat Enron Wind's plan to build a gimongous windmill generating farm. Make the Ranch safe for development, housing, industry, freeways and traffic. Heritage of ranching and farming (picture #1 at this page shows a huge double pipeline laid across the land surface). I wouldn't mind so much if they were more honest about the changes wrought on the semi-desert landscape by the traditional ranching and farming over the past centuries: soil loss, erosion, flooding, fires, species diversity reduction, pollution. Wherever humans go, these changes will occur. Be forthcoming about it.
Well, back to parlor-tricks. This here flame site reminds me a lot of what the North American pioneers said about the Platte River: "Too thick to drink, too deep to plow." Russ Limbagh meets John Kenneth Galbraith on a hangover day. The cabal of the Rockefellers is the whipping boy against which the writer directs his logorreah. At least the writer has not reverted to prior type and pinned the blame on religious or ethnic characterizations. But if, for "rich greedy rapacious economic carnivore" you substitute "non-majority ethnic or religous faction", it still scans. Thank Goddess, or Gaia, or the Patriarchal OverLord for Hyde Park and all of its ilk. It gives us a chance to build up a bit of a callous to cavalier diatribe (Latin derivation).
Comments:
Post a Comment- I looked at the resume of the site author. The large number of relatively minor educational positions speak to your point exactly. To put it kindly, this prohet is without favor in his own milieu.
We interrupt our symposium on construction materials for the following news bulletin: "Federal Source to ABC News: We Know Who You're Calling."
Comments:
- Is it just me, or is there a thick vein of red brick concrete or red-brick asphalt running through the collective public psyche. One of three things perhaps: 1) Public perception is so skewed by spin-doctoring and advert-reporting that people think we are safe and sane 2) Public brain power and reasoning capabilty has been so eroded by tolerance for laxity (symptomologically shown by tracking TV content over several decades) that knee-jerks fill most of the potato couches, or 3) The thoughtful and reasonable are so morose and hopeless that they don't care to waste their words any more. Come to think of it, all three probably apply. Archie bunker-land has moved from satire to actuality. Welcome to the fruition of our hopeful youths.
- I can't help but think that some of those comments were posted by trolls trying to start a flame war. Either that or paid shills ala Donald Segretti of Watergate infamy.
Post a Comment- "National Security Letters"? The Sagretti meat-ball dirty tricks are legitimized by Executive Branch fiat. You want to expose your rival to the world? Label him or her a "security risk" and let slip the dogs of war. The tax agencies have been able to hog tie and impoverish anyone at any time without just cause for decades. Now the politicos are "legalizing" the same powers. It seems to me that the administration jams a bill through Congress that permits a tiny little erosion of liberty under very limited circumstances. The administration lawyers then apply this minor feature by stating "the obvious intent of Congress was to let us make things safer and more secure, so that is what we are doing" (applying the supposed intent rather than the actual written law). Then the Justice Department uses the unchallenged actions as "precedentss" to justify additional expansions of the original limited statute. Kind of like the McCarthy investigations, using fear and threats and propoganda to cut down due process. The lure of such power must be like crack cocaine to the Feds: easy to get, addictive as all get out and impossible to kick.
It's about the environment, after all. Use it we will, so use it better, use it lighter. Just for you, Russ, look here.
Comments:
Post a Comment- No no no. The "five steps needed to make bricks" are as follows:
The first step is called CULTIVATING, or growing the material.
The second step is HARVESTING the material.
The third step (their fourth) is DRYING.
The fourth step (their third) is MOULDING.
The fifth step (we heartily agree on this one) is BURNING.
The bottom photo, two ten-year olds happily making bricks, is obviously staged as the aforementioned ten-year olds are clearly not of Latin or South American lineage.
And the moral of the story? Don't believe everything you read on the internet.
Concrete? Multiple posts (with links yet) about concrete? Then asphalt? What the fuck? Gotta admit it makes for a logical segue but, damn.
Comments:
Post a Comment- Amen to that, Brother! But, hey, at least we have an actual discussion going bring information and enlightenment to all who care to imbibe.
Porous asphalt paving installations that can store and control runoff of storm water has been in use for 20 years in some areas. Check out an article published by Stormwater (a journal about surface water quality) describing Porous Asphalt to see how parking areas and retention basins are combined into one system.
Comments:
Post a Comment- I would still favor concrete over asphalt for two reasons.
1) The lime content of concrete makes it act as a preliminary water softener. New Englanders would coat the inside of cisterns with cement to sweeten the water.
2) Asphalt is a petroleum product and leaches distillates which are carried in the runoff. I would think that is this the with porous versions also. It seems that the greater surface area in contact with the water due to fact of its porosity would exacerbate this characteristic.
Any step to eliminating the artificial sluices that streets and parking lots become whenever it rains (like the last week here)and utilizing natural filtration by the sub-soil is a step in the right direction.
PS - I'm actually enjoying this exchange. We should have more like it.
Tony's posting has a link that leads to LiTraCon, a company that makes concrete that transmits light. I found a description of the process at Science News Online from an article titled Concrete Nation published on January 1, 2005. The article also describes a stronger, more flexible concrete called Ductal and a self-consolidating concrete called Agilia developed by the French company Lafarge. Self-consolidating means that it doesn't require vibration or a lot of surface troweling to flow into a smooth, air-bubble-free slab. Saves time and personpower for installation. Ductal has small non-metallic or steel fibers that spread throughout the mix instead of reinforcement bars or wire. These are less likely to corrode and separate from the concrete that surrounds them than are the traditional steel bars, so the fiber-filled homogenous mixture can flex more than can a traditional slab.
Comments:
Post a Comment- Neat stuff. Glass and rock Forward into the Stone Age!
Ford repaved the parking lot at the Rouge River palnt with porous concrete that virtually eliminated runoff into the river. One article I read claimed that the water that reached the river was cleaner than the the rain that originally fell on the lot.
A book that might interest anyone concerned with recycling is Cradle To Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things
Enjoy
Check this out!
Comments:
- Aligning the optical fibers during the pour is the part for which I cannot visualize the machinery. The concrete appears to be a very fine-grained variety, which implies very small aggregate; silica sand instead of stones or rocks. If the conrete is pumped into the mold under pressure, and is forced around and through the matrix of optical fibers that is clamped in place at both ends, it doesn't matter what entanglement of fibers occurs in the middle. As long as both ends remain aligned, the image will be assembled correctly on the shadow side. If fibers were thrown into the mix without securing the ends, very few would peek out at each side to transmit light. It is also possible that they cast long sections, keeping fibers aligned, and then cut them into blocks of the desired thicknesss.
Combining the thermal-storage capacity of masonry with light-transmission capabilities makes it easier to build passive solar structures without them feeling like grey drab prisons. The web site indicates that light transmission is unaffected at thicknesses up to 20 meters. That's a very thick wall!
Post a Comment- Very handy for that all-important underground bunker we'll all be building soon. Just think if you angle the fibers you could bring a modicum of light into a basement. Kind of like a vision impaired camera oscura.
Looks like about 35% of registered voters in Lorain County turned out for the primary yesterday. This is an estimated 67,000 voters out of 187,639 registered voters. Some 44,094 Democrats and 22,478 Republicans voted. That leaves about 428 undeclared voters who were not allowed to choose candidates, but were limited to choices on issues only. Once again, I requested the right to choose candidates from both parties, where I saw potential merit. Once again, the poll workers looked at me blankly and reiterated their question about what party I declared. In fact, when I first stepped up to the precinct table to sign the book, I handed the lady my driver's license to avoid confusion and repetitive questions about who I was and where I lived. She looked at the plastic card for a while. She then looked up at me and said: "Is this your first name or your last name?" "Yes," I answered. I don't think she even looked at the picture to be sure I was really the person who was supposed to vote.
Comments:
Post a Comment- I have had this bug up my ass about primaries for years now. I don't understand why the government is involved in overseeing the inner workings of what are, essentially, private organizations. The average voter "declares" a party, but very few are actually members of either party. Wouldn't it be interesting if the poll workers demanded to see party membership cards (as in: you paid dues to the party) before allowing you to vote. It would also be interesting if the parties had to arrange their own polling places and workers with the added neccessity of informing their members where those places were.That would alter their approach.
The other oddity of the system is that it allows for a very painless process of affiliation. This makes it possible for impostors to switch parties any influence the nomination of the opposition candidate. (Try to conjour up an image of Karl Rove here).
Why only the two? There are actually a whole bunch of parties out there none of which get government funding or technical support for their internal elections.
So I say we take the considerable funding that is required to promote and execute these shams and put it into, oh . . I don't know . . . education, maybe . How about public transportation. Or methanol fuel cells. Or . . . . .
What has your dog said lately?
Comments: